Comparative review and evaluation of cyber space policies at international and national level; A comparative study of the international cyber space strategy document of the Netherlands and the strategic document of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the cyber space
Subject Areas : Technology Transfer and Commercialization of ResearchesSeyedRazi Agaseiedi 1 , Ahmad Vedadi 2 , Mohammad Reza Rabii Mandiji 3 , علی رضائیان 4
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
Keywords: Cyber Space, Policy Making, Policy Evaluation, Cyber Space Strategic Document, Policy Comparative Analysis, Cyber Geopolitics,
Abstract :
The growth of technology, especially the nascence of the cyber space in all aspects of human life and governance at the global, national, organizational and individual levels of humans, has had tremendous effects, and the rapid advances in technology affect people's lives, making timely, effective and feasible policies Continuous evaluation and improvement in cyberspace is needed more than ever. The maturity level of cyber space policies can put a country in geopolitical isolation, geopolitical challenge or geopolitical evolution in the geopolitical world of cyber space, all of which show the necessity of comparative review and continuous evaluations of national and international policies. Therefore, in this research, while using comparative studies with the method of George F. Brady, we have studied and evaluated the strategic policies of the international cyber space of the Netherlands and the strategic document of the cyber space of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The predominance of the objectivist and bottom-up approach, limited and specific goals, short-term time frame and writing goals based on the challenges identified in the strategic document of the Netherlands has increased the ability of this document to be implemented, and in order to include the expected results, it is possible to evaluate The rate of achieving goals has become clearer. Therefore, in order to achieve the goals written in the document, it is proposed to design a comprehensive model for the evaluation of cyber space policies in order to continuously improve policies in this area and reduce the digital divide
1- عاملی، سعیدرضا، و حسنی، حسین. (1391). دوفضایی شدن آسیب ها و ناهنجاری های فضای مجازی: مطالعه تطبیقی سیاست گذاری های بین المللی. تحقیقات فرهنگی ایران، 5(1 (پیاپی 17))، 1-30.
2- حاجی علی محمدی، مقصود؛ موذن زادگان، حسن علی؛ رضوی فرد، بهزاد (۱۳۹۴). تولید، ارسال و مورد معامله قرار دادن آثار مستهجن و مبتذل در فضای مجازی. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد. تهران، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
3- شکری، زینب؛ داناییفرد، حسن؛ خیرگو، منصور؛ فانی، علی اصغر. 1397. چگونگی ارزشیابی کیفیت خطمشیهای عمومی در ایران: پژوهشی اکتشافی مبتنی بر روششناسی ترکیبی. مدیریت سازمانهای دولتی، دوره 6، شماره 2، 79 تا 94
4- الواني، مهدي و همکاران،(1389)، مؤلفههاي تدوين استراتژي ملي مبارزه با فساد جمهوري اسلامي ايران، نشريه مديريت دولتي، دوره 2، شماره 4، 3-22.
5- الوانی، سیدمهدی، و فتاح شریف¬زاده، (1388)، فرآیند خط¬مشی¬گذاری عمومی، انتشارات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، چاپ هفتم، تهران. (فصلنامه مديريت)، سال هشتم، شماره 21، 88-103.
6- دانایی¬فرد، حسن، و همکاران، (1392)، روش¬شناسی پژوهش کیفی در مدیریت: رویکردی جامع، انتشارات صفار، تهران، چاپ دوم.
7- Esser, F., & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). Comparative research methods. The international encyclopedia of communication research methods , 1-22. DOI: 10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0035 .
8- Ghanavati, F. & Mashayekh, J. (2022). Methodological Foundations in Comparative Studies of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Iran. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 15(2), 93-108. {In Persian}.
9- https://farsi.khamenei.ir/roadmap-content?id=30665
10- Executive regulations related to duties and work methods of the communications Regulatory Commission of
11- Chompucot M C. (2011). Major Factors Affecting Educational Policy Implementation Effectiveness for the Three Southern most Provinces of Thailand as Perceived by School Directors, Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, National Institute of Development Administration
12- Chaiton A. Dibbits T. Paquet G. Roy J. Wilson C. 2002. The Collaborative Challenges OF Regional Governance, policy issues for Canada and beyond, p.111
13- Hjern, B. (1982). Implementation Research: The Link Gone Missing. Journal of Public Policy, 2(3): 301–308.
14- Howlett, M, Ramesh, M, & Perl, A. (2009). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems(3th ed.). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
15- Hogwood, B.W. & Gunn, L. (2011). Policy Analysis for the Real World. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. IPPR. (2005). http://www.ippr.org.uk.
16- Howlett, M. (1995). Studying Public policy. Oxford university press.
17- Lipsky, M. (1978). Standing the Study of Public Policy Implementation on Its Head, In: Burnham, London: Sage.
18- Sabatier, P.A. (1986). Paul, Top – down and Bottom – up Approaches to Implementation Research. Journal of public policy, 6(1): 21-48.
19- Sabatier, P. (1991). Towards Better Theories of the Policy Process. Political Science and Politics June. University of California Press.
20- Sabatier, P. A. & Mazmanian, D. (1979). The Implementation of Public Policy: A Framework of Analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4): 538-560.
21- Sabatier, P.A. & Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. West view Press, Boulder
22- Linder, S. & Peters, G. (1987). A Design Perspective on Policy Implementation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
23- Parsons, W. (1995). Public Policy. An introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar. Barne Policy Studies Review, 6 (3).
24- DeLeon, p. (2008). The Historical Roots of the field. in The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford University Press.
25- Mill, J. S. (2009). A System of Logic (8th Ed.). Ratiocinative and Inductive. Gutenberg EBook.
26- Barrett, S. & Fudge, C. (1981). Examining the Policy-action Relationship. Methuen: London.
27- Barrett, S. & Fudge, C. (1981). Policy and Action: Essays on the Implementation of Public Policy, (eds). London: Methuen.
28- Barrett, S. & Hill, M. (1984). Policy, Bargaining and Structure in Implementation Theory. Policy and Politics, 12(3): 219-240.
29- Barrett, S. (2004). Implementation Studies: Time for a Revival? Personal Reflections on 20 Years of Implementation Studie
